Graphic Software

You are using an outdated version of IE which is not supported by ResearchGate anymore. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade your browser now
Need to know the best user friendly graphic software quipped with all biological 2D, 3D pictures as have been shown in the attached illustration. Will be truly grateful for the kind help.
Are?there any graphics software for non rigid 3D point cloud registration between undeformed and slightly deformed surfaces obtained through light scans?
The scans are high resolution stl files where the mesh do not match between the two scans. The displacements are limited to less than 2% of the overall object?dimensions.
It's main advantage is that it is totally online and has a vast library of illustrations?of scientific images. Is even better for Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Biology etc
I am looking for a software which is able to draw a picture of bacteria easily? Photoshop is good but complicated.
Is there anyone could recommend some useful tools for images and tables when writing thesis and preparing PPT?
I like one called Mind the Graph ().?It has a big biology library and?everything is harmonic, so you save a loooot of time.
I would recommend the BuildDNA-tool of ePMV. ePMV is a free plugin for Cinema4D, Blender (free), Autodesk Maya and Autodesk 3ds Max.
in addition, I recommend to subscribe to the cp2k google group. Many questions, Graphitii Product answers and available data are very helpful to start with.
Here, I use for plots and simulations an old version of the Origin, since is very easy to entry with a simple or complex formula.
Please, if possible consider seeing the paper recently published by us in attach, in which Equations 11 and 12 were implemented in the Origin to attain further simulation/verifying of a physical response of a ceramic material. Results derived from the Origin (theoretical adjust) are showed in Fig. 13 of the paper.
In the sequence, a plot with multiple graphics can be observed in Fig 14. See, the scale presentation can be adjusted by a simple click linear x log, linear x ln, log x log etc,...,etc and turned to the original again by a simple click.
I have a problem, because in my experiments average microsaccadic rate is too low (the maximum on the peak is about 0.4 and average is about 0,1 - it depends on averaging window). I made many modulation with stimulus size, luminance, duration. The experiment protocol and microsaccade's detection was similar to this article (%2Fs00426-013-0490-z) Stimulus duration is 100ms, I show realistic emotional images. Algorithm parameters: min duration -6,velocity threshold 6, sampling rate 500, velocity type -2.
I thought that it can be due to bright flash, when picture is shown in full screen, but microsaccadic rate is just quite higher with smaller images (vive versa for this research -millan_etal_pnas13.pdf so the problem should be somewhere else). Maybe somebody faced similar problem?
1) How to calculate microsaccadic rate- do I have to take all microsaccade's duration or just count it like a Dirac's function (due to high sampling rate this method makes microsaccadic rate very low).
2) I am not sure that I understand the exactly meaning of DPP coefficient in microsaccade's detection algorithm. What would be the best way to calculate it and in what dimension?
However, the process took too long. So when I need to analysis another portion of MODISA data, I would like to tried command line based SeaDAS (version 6?). I heard it faster than GUI version (but I am not sure about that).
I tried to follow the instructions on?, but I stuck at download step. Since I am using Mac with OS 10.9, I run the command lines on XQuartz (X11, version 2.7.7). I use "anonymous" to login ftp (site: ). After?switch to "binary", I enter "cd seadas/seadas"
I get "550 fail to open file". I think it's an error message. I have tried to download different files in this directory, but I keep getting the same error message.
Have anyone successfully download and install command line based SeaDAS? How do you do that? Does it works faster than GUI version?